<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front><article-meta>
<title-group><article-title>Forced Convection and MHD Effect of Non-Newtonian Fluids Along a Pipe</article-title></title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Moslemi</surname><given-names>Mehdi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib>
<aff id="aff1">Department of Mechanical Engineering Ayandegan Institute of Higher Education, Tonekabon, Iran.</aff>
</contrib-group>
<abstract><p>In this paper, the forced convection heat transfer of incompressible, Power law Non-Newtonian fluids through two-dimensional circular pipes in the presence of an external uniform magnetic field was considered. Moreover, momentum and energy equations are solved using a finite volume method and a simple algorithm. Two cases of the thermal boundary condition, a constant temperature and a constant heat flux at the wall, are investigated. The viscous and Joule dissipations are taken into account in the energy equation. Moreover, the influence of the magnetic field and flow behavior index (n) on the velocity distribution, the friction factor, and the Nusselt numbers is discussed. Also, the influence of the viscous and Joule dissipations on the Nusselt numbers is investigated. The results show that the magnetic field has a damping effect on the flow for all values of n. By increasing n, the maximum fluid velocity and friction factor will increase. Increasing n increases maximum fluid velocity and friction factor. Increasing the Hartmann number decreases maximum fluid velocity and increases the friction factor. Also, the increment in the Brinkman number decreases the value of the Nusselt number for all Hartmann numbers and n.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author"><kwd>Magnetohydrodynamic flow</kwd><kwd>Forced convection</kwd><kwd>Power-law fluid</kwd><kwd>Simple algorithm</kwd></kwd-group>
</article-meta></front>
<body>
<sec id="sec-1"><label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
<p>The study of Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) viscous flows is important for industrial, technological, and geothermal applications, such as high-temperature plasmas, cooling of nuclear reactors, MHD accelerators, and power generation systems. On the other hand, several industrially important fluids, such as polymer solutions and melts, rubber, blood, molten plastics, polymers, pulps, and foods, exhibit Non-Newtonian fluid behavior. Due to the growing use of these non-Newtonian materials in various manufacturing and processing industries, considerable efforts have been made towards understanding their flow characteristics. Min et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-1">[1]</xref> studied analytically the fully developed laminar flow of a Bingham plastic in a circular pipe. Hossain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-2">[2]</xref> determined that viscous and Joule heating effects on MHD free convection flows with variable plate temperature vary linearly with a distance from the leading edge in the presence of a uniform transverse magnetic field. The equations governing the flow were solved numerically by applying the finite difference method along with Newton&apos;s linearization approximation. Jha <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-3">[3]</xref> studied the natural convection in unsteady Couette motion.</p>
<p>The problem of MHD flow and heat transfer with variable viscosity for Newtonian fluids in a rectangular duct with the Hall Effect has been investigated numerically by Sayed-Ahmed and Attia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-5">[4]</xref>. Sayed-Ahmed and Attia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-6">[5]</xref> investigated the effect of Hall current on MHD flow and heat transfer for Bingham fluids in a rectangular duct. Attia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-7">[6]</xref> investigated the Hall Effect on the Flow of a Dusty Bingham Fluid in a Circular Pipe. The problem of Numerical solution of power law fluid flow and heat transfer with a magnetic field in a rectangular duct and with velocity gradient dependent viscosity has been investigated numerically by Sayed-Ahmed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-8">[7]</xref>.</p>
<p>It is of interest in this paper to study the influence of the magnetic field as well as the Non-Newtonian fluid characteristics on the friction factor and Nusselt number. The research has investigated the steady MHD laminar flow and heat transfer of viscous and incompressible electrically conducting Power law fluids through a 2D circular duct, where the fluid is subjected to an external uniform magnetic field. The momentum and energy equations, including the viscous and Joule dissipation terms, have been solved numerically using the finite volume method. The energy equation has been solved for a constant temperature and a constant flux at the wall. The influences of the magnetic field and the characteristics of the Non-Newtonian fluid on the velocity and temperature distributions have been studied.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-2"><label>2</label><title>Mathematical Model</title>
<p>A steady laminar and axisymmetric horizontal flow of a viscous incompressible electrically conducting non-Newtonian Power law fluid in a duct of circular cross-section has been considered. The geometry of the problem is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Fig. 1</xref>, where the cylindrical coordinate system (r,z) is located as shown. An external uniform magnetic field B0 is applied arbitrarily in the plane perpendicular to the z-axis.</p>
<p>The magnetic field exerts a restraining force on the conductor, which tends to impede its motion. This force is known to be proportional to its speed of motion and the magnetic field strength. The current flow in the conductor generates Joule&apos;s heat <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-9">[8]</xref>.</p>
<fig id="fig1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Sketch of the problem.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:1:66,128.9,537.1,324.4"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<p>The governing equations of the problem are:</p>
<p>Continuity equation Momentum equation</p>
<p>Electromagnetic Lorentz force</p>
<p>Energy equation</p>
<p>Joule dissipation</p>
<p>Current density</p>
<p>where is the velocity vector of the fluid. Assuming a small magnetic Reynolds number (Rem&lt;&lt;1), neglecting the induced magnetic field, and also assuming that there is no excess charge in the electrically conducting fluid guarantees that the induced electric field is negligible <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-3">[3]</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-9">[8]</xref>. An apparent viscosity is used for analogy, Non-Newtonian fluid (power law) to Newtonian fluid, given by</p>
<p>The boundary conditions are given by</p>
<p>The following two cases of the thermal boundary conditions are considered.</p>
<p>Case 1. A constant temperature at the wall where,</p>
<p>Case 2. A constant heat flux at the wall, where</p>
<p>(10)</p>
<p>Due to the axisymmetry of the problem, only one half of a cross-section of the duct (0≤R≤1/2 and 0≤L≤15) was considered.</p>
<p>Governing equations in the cylindrical coordinate system in two-dimensional forms have been written in the non-dimensional form, while the following non-dimensional variables and parameters were introduced <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-9">[8]</xref>:</p>
<p>where</p>
<p>Case 1. and</p>
<p>Case 2. Thus, governing equations in dimensionless form are</p>
<p>Continuity equation</p>
<p>(11)</p>
<p>z- momentum equation</p>
<p>(12)</p>
<p>r- momentum equation</p>
<p>(13)</p>
<p>Energy equation</p>
<p>(14)</p>
<p>where , viscous dissipation</p>
<p>(15)</p>
<p>where Joule dissipation</p>
<p>(16)</p>
<p>Adding the continuity equation with the momentum and energy equation, the source term has been introduced.</p>
<p>(17)</p>
<p>Where the source term, S, has been linearized in the usual manner and is a general variable which can be replaced by U, V, or and is the diffusion coefficient. Equations are discretized, using finite volume, where convection terms are discretized by the upwind method (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Fig. 2</xref>).</p>
<fig id="fig2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p>Control volume for two-dimensional situations.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:4:66,436.1,537.1,645.1"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<p>(18)</p>
<p>where coefficients are:</p>
<p>A new operator ( ) has been defined where ( ) denotes the greater of A and B. The boundary conditions for the velocity are given:</p>
<p>(19)</p>
<p>The boundary conditions for the temperature are given:</p>
<p>Case 1. A constant temperature at the wall,</p>
<p>(20)</p>
<p>Case 2. A constant heat flux at the wall, (21)</p>
<p>The f.Re factor is defined as the product of the friction factor and the Reynolds number in the fully developed region and given by</p>
<p>(22)</p>
<p>The local Nusselt number for the two cases is given by Case 1.</p>
<p>(23)</p>
<p>Case 2.</p>
<p>(24)</p>
<p>Where the average Nusselt number, Nu, for the two cases is given by</p>
<p>(25)</p>
<p>The continuity, momentum, and energy equations are solved using a finite volume method and a simple algorithm in which convection terms are applied using the upwind scheme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-10">[9]</xref>. An iterative procedure algorithm has been used to solve the momentum continuity and energy equations.</p>
<p>The process is repeated until the criteria of convergence for the continuity equation, which is less than 10-6, are satisfied. For the thermal boundary condition, the process is repeated until the criterion of convergence is satisfied for temperature. The convergence is achieved by taking 30×2400 mesh points for both hydrodynamic and thermal parts.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-3"><label>3</label><title>Results and Discussion</title>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref> compare the values of the fluid velocity and (f.Re), in mid-line, with analytical results in Refs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-11">[10]</xref>, for nonmagnetic. The comparison shows a very good agreement between those.</p>
<table-wrap id="tab1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Comparison values of the U velocity.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:5:66,181,537.1,230.4"/><p content-type="note">This table is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tab2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>Comparison value of f. Re.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:5:66,110.3,537.1,150.8"/><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:6:66,727.5,537.1,757.7"/><p content-type="note">This table is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></table-wrap>
<p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Fig. 3</xref> shows the variation of f.Re with Ha number (indicated power of magnetic field) for various values of n. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Fig. 3</xref> shows that increasing the degree of shear of the fluid decreases the wall shear rate, where n becomes smaller, causing the viscosity to decrease even faster. The shear stress is the product of the shear rate and the viscosity; therefore, there will be a net increase in wall shear stress (i.e., f.Re). It is also found that increasing the Hartmann number increases the wall shear rate, causing an increase in wall shear stress (i.e., f.Re).</p>
<fig id="fig3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p>Variation of f.Re with the Hartmann number.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:6:66,435.7,537.1,614.4"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Fig. 4</xref> presents the variation of the maximum velocity U for the fully developed region. Due to the damping effect of the magnetic field, increasing the Hartmann number decreases the maximum velocity. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Fig. 4</xref> also shows that increasing n increases the viscosity and wall shear stress, causing an increase in the maximum</p>
<fig id="fig4"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p>Variation of Umax versus Ha.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:6:65.9,162.1,537.1,372.5"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<p>The variation of the velocity U for the fully developed region of a circular cross-section with the radius R with respect to various values of Ha and n is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figs. 5</xref>-10. Figs indicate that increasing Hartmann number decreases U for all values of n. Increasing the flow index n increases U for all values of the Hartmann number.</p>
<p>The velocity profile U becomes increasingly flattened with R for large values of Hartmann number (Ha=9) and shear thinning fluid (n=0.5), which is due to the damping effect of the magnetic field. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Fig. 5</xref> indicates that for R&lt;0.33, increasing the Hartmann number decreases velocity.</p>
<fig id="fig5"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p>Variation of U velocity versus R (n=0.5).</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:7:66,528.4,537.1,718.7"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<fig id="fig6"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p>Variation of U velocity versus R (n=1).</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:7:66,323.9,537.1,513.9"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<fig id="fig7"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p>Variation of U velocity versus R (n=1.5).</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:7:66,126.3,537.1,309.4"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<fig id="fig8"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p>Variation of U velocity versus R (Ha=0).</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:8:66,577.1,537.1,777"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<fig id="fig9"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p>Variation of U velocity versus R (Ha=6).</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:8:66,362.2,537.1,562.7"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<fig id="fig10"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p>Variation of U velocity versus R (Ha=9).</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:8:66,156.8,537.1,347.7"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11">Figs. 11</xref>-16 show the variation of the average Nusselt number, Nu, for two defined cases with Hartmann number for various values of viscosity index, Pr, and Re, where the dissipation terms are assumed to be negligible for Br=0.</p>
<p>Figures show that increasing n decreases the average Nusselt number for all values of Hartmann number. However, increasing the Hartmann number increases Num while increasing the Reynolds or Prandtl number The fact is that increasing the Hartman number or decreasing the viscosity index value decreases the wall shear rate, which causes an increase in thermal diffusion at the wall and follows an increase in Nusselt number. Variation of the average Nusselt number, Num, with Hartmann number and viscosity index, for Case 1, is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig17">Fig. 17</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig18">Fig. 18</xref>, respectively. Figs show, for Br=0, increasing viscosity index and decreasing Num, while increasing Hartmann number increases Num. Variation of Num versus Ha is more considerable for n&lt;1. When Br=0.5, for small Hartmann (Ha&lt;1), increasing n increases Num, while for Ha&gt;1, a reversed effect can be seen. When Br=1, increasing n increases Num. Increasing Hartmann number decreases Num up to n=0.65, while for n &gt; 0.65, Num increases gradually.</p>
<fig id="fig11"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p>Variation of Num versus Ha [case 1. Br=0, Pr=3000 &amp; Re=10].</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:9:65.9,528.2,537.1,733"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<fig id="fig12"><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p>Variation of num versus Ha [case 1. Br=0, Pr=6000 &amp; Re=10].</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:9:66,314.5,537.1,513.7"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<fig id="fig13"><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p>Variation of num versus Ha [case 1. Br=0, Pr=3000 &amp; Re=30].</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:9:66,104,537.1,300.1"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<fig id="fig14"><label>Figure 14</label><caption><p>Variation of num versus Ha [case 2. Br=0, Pr=3000 &amp; Re=10].</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:10:66,577.1,537.1,777"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<fig id="fig15"><label>Figure 15</label><caption><p>Variation of num versus Ha [case 2. Br=0, Pr=6000 &amp; Re=10 ].</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:10:66,374.2,537.1,562.7"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<fig id="fig16"><label>Figure 16</label><caption><p>Variation of num versus Ha [case 2. Br=0, Pr=3000, &amp; Re=30].</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:10:66,161.7,537.1,359.7"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<fig id="fig17"><label>Figure 17</label><caption><p>Variation of num versus Ha [Pr=3000&amp; Re=10]</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:11:66,561.9,537.1,733"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<p>Case 1. − − n=0.5, ——n=1.5, □Br=0, ∆Br=0.5, * Br=1.</p>
<fig id="fig18"><label>Figure 18</label><caption><p>Variation num versus n for Pr=3000, Re=10</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:11:66,346.1,537.1,528.5"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<p>Case 1. − − n=0.5, ——n=1.5, □Br=0, ∆Br=0.5, * Br=1.</p>
<p>The variation of the average Nusselt number, Num, with Hartmann number and viscosity index for Case 2 is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig19">Fig. 19</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig20">Fig. 20</xref>, respectively. Figs show, for Br=0, increasing n decreases Num while increasing Ha increases Num. For Br = 0.5 and 1, increasing Ha decreases Num while increasing n increases Num. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig17">Figs. 17</xref>-20 also indicate that increasing the Brinkman number decreases Num for all values of Ha and n.</p>
<fig id="fig19"><label>Figure 19</label><caption><p>Variation of num versus Ha for Pr=3000, Re=10, Case 2. − − −Ha=0, ——Ha=9, □Br=0, ∆Br=0.5, * Br=1.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:11:66,108.9,537.1,249.8"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<fig id="fig20"><label>Figure 20</label><caption><p>Variation of num versus n for Pr=3000, Re=10, Case 2. − − −Ha=0, ——Ha=9, □Br=0, ∆Br=0.5, * Br=1.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:12:66,599.9,537.1,777"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<p>Variation of the local Nusselt number for Case 1 and Case 2 versus the length of the pipe for different Br numbers is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig21">Figs. 21</xref>-23. Figs present that increasing Br decreases the local Nusselt number. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig22">Fig. 22</xref> shows, for Br=1, at the end of the length of pipe (from 13.25 up to 15), there is a heat transfer from fluid to [Case 2. □Br=0,+ Br=0.5, * Br=1].</p>
<fig id="fig21"><label>Figure 21</label><caption><p>Variation of local Nusselt versus length [Case 1] □Br=0,+ Br=0.5, * Br=1.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:12:65.9,350.1,537.1,523.9"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<fig id="fig22"><label>Figure 22</label><caption><p>Variation of local Nusselt versus length [Case 2] □Br=0,+ Br=0.5, * Br=1.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:12:66,168.9,537.1,322.8"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<fig id="fig23"><label>Figure 23</label><caption><p>Variation of local Nusselt versus length</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:13:66,607.4,537.1,776.7"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<fig id="fig24"><label>Figure 24</label><caption><p>Variation of local Nusselt versus length</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:13:66,413.8,537.1,592.9"/><p content-type="note">This figure is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></fig>
<p>The phenomenon can be explained by the fact that the heat generated by dissipation terms causes an increase in fluid temperature and results in a heat transfer from fluid to the pipe wall, consequently decreasing the Nusselt number.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-4"><label>4</label><title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The steady laminar MHD flow of a viscous and incompressible conducting Non-Newtonian power law fluid in a circular duct was studied. The momentum and energy equations for two cases of thermal boundary conditions were solved numerically using the finite volume method. The effects of the magnetic field (Hartmann number) and the Non-Newtonian fluid characteristics (flow behavior index) on the flow and the heat transfer were discussed. Comparing the numerical results with analytical results for values of the maximum fluid velocity and friction factor for nonmagnetic reveals a good agreement.</p>
<p>The results show that the magnetic field has a damping effect on the flow for all values of the viscosity index, n. The increment in the Brinkman number decreases the value of the Nusselt number for all Hartmann numbers and viscosity index for two cases of thermal boundary conditions. Increasing the Hartmann number decreases maximum fluid velocity and increases the friction factor. Increasing the viscosity index increases maximum fluid velocity and friction factor.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-5"><title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-6"><title>Data Availability</title>
<p>All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. No additional data are available.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-7"><title>Funding</title>
<p>This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-8"><title>Appendix</title>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-9"><title>Nomenclature</title>
<p>B0: magnetic field.</p>
<p>Br: Brinkman number.</p>
<p>Cp: specific heat.</p>
<p>D: diameter of pipe.</p>
<p>E: electric field.</p>
<p>F: friction factor.</p>
<p>Fe: external magnetic force.</p>
<p>Ha: hartmann number.</p>
<p>J: current density.</p>
<p>K: thermal conductivity.</p>
<p>l: length of pipe.</p>
<p>m: consistency index of the model.</p>
<p>n: flow behavior index.</p>
<p>Num: average Nusselt number.</p>
<p>NuT, Nuq: local Nusselt number.</p>
<p>P: pressure.</p>
<p>P0: reference pressure.</p>
<p>Pr: prantl number.</p>
<p>q&apos;&apos;: heat flux.</p>
<p>R: radius of pipe.</p>
<p>r,z: cylindrical coordinates.</p>
<p>Re: Reynolds number.</p>
<p>Rem: magnetic Reynolds number.</p>
<p>T: temperature.</p>
<p>T0: reference temperature.</p>
<p>Tw: temperature at the wall.</p>
<p>u: z component of the fluid velocity.</p>
<p>v: r component of the fluid velocity.</p>
<sec id="sec-10"><title>Greek symbols</title>
<p>∆Z, ∆R: step size in Z and R coordinates.</p>
<p>: electric conductivity.</p>
<p>: apparent viscosity.</p>
<p>: reference viscosity of power law fluid.</p>
<p>: dimensionless apparent viscosity.</p>
<p>: viscous dissipation.</p>
<p>: joule dissipation.</p>
<p>: reference density.</p>
<p>: density.</p>
<p>: dimensionless temperature.</p>
<p>: general variables.</p>
<p>: shear rate.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-figures"><title>Figures</title>
</sec>
</body>
<back><ref-list><title>References</title>
<ref id="ref-1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Min, T., Choi, H. G., Yoo, J. Y., &amp; Choi, H. (1997). Laminar convective heat transfer of a Bingham plastic in a circular pipe—II. Numerical approach hydrodynamically developing flow and simultaneously developing flow. International journal of heat and mass transfer, 40(15), 3689–3701. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0017-9310(97)00004-5">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0017-9310(97)00004-5</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Hossain, M. A. (1992). Viscous and Joule heating effects on MHD-free convection flow with variable plate temperature. International journal of heat and mass transfer, 35(12), 3485–3487. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(92)90234-J">https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(92)90234-J</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Jha, B. K. (2001). Natural convection in unsteady MHD Couette flow. Heat and mass transfer, 37(4), 329–</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-4"><label>331</label><mixed-citation><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00013295%0A%0A">https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00013295%0A%0A</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-5"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Sayed-Ahmed, M. E., &amp; Attia, H. A. (2000). MHD flow and heat transfer in a rectangular duct with temperature dependent viscosity and Hall effect. International communications in heat and mass transfer, 27(8), 1177–1187. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1933(00)00204-9">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1933(00)00204-9</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-6"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Sayed-Ahmed, M. E., &amp; Attia, H. A. (2005). The effect of Hall current on magnetohydrodynamic flow and heat transfer forBingham fluids in a rectangular duct. Canadian journal of physics, 83(6), 637–651. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/p05-006">https://doi.org/10.1139/p05-006</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-7"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Attia, H. A. (2006). Hall effect on the flow of a dusty bingham fluid in a circular pipe. Turkish journal of engineering &amp; environmental sciences, 30(1). 14-21. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A2%3A2736082/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Ascholar&amp;id">https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A2%3A2736082/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Ascholar&amp;id</ext-link> =ebsco%3Agcd%3A21183349&amp;crl=c&amp;link_origin=scholar.google.com</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-8"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Sayed Ahmed, M. E. (2006). Numerical solution of power law fluids flow and heat transfer with a magnetic field in a rectangular duct. International communications in heat and mass transfer, 33(9), 1165–1176. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2006.06.003">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2006.06.003</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-9"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Holman, J. P. (1996). Heat transfer. McGraw hill college. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.scribd.com/doc/52043947/Heat-Transfer-J-P-Holman">https://www.scribd.com/doc/52043947/Heat-Transfer-J-P-Holman</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-10"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Patankar, S. (2018). Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. CRC press. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482234213">https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482234213</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-11"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Skelland, A. H. P., &amp; Flow, N. N. (1967). Non-Newtonian Flow and Heat Transfer. Wiley. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://books.google.nl/books/about/Non_Newtonian_Flow_and_Heat_Transfer.html?id=-07xAAAAMAAJ&amp;redir_esc=y">https://books.google.nl/books/about/Non_Newtonian_Flow_and_Heat_Transfer.html?id=-07xAAAAMAAJ&amp;redir_esc=y</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list></back>
</article>