Concurrent Detection of Surface and Subsurface Defects via Phased Array Ultrasonic Multiple Inspection: A Finite Element Simulation Study

Authors

https://doi.org/10.48313/mtei.v3i1.81

Abstract

The question of decreasing the time of inspections while increasing their detection accuracy still appears crucial in modern industrial settings. The use of advanced techniques of Nondestructive Testing (NDT) has made it possible to increase performance and improve the accuracy of the inspection process. Ultrasonic phased array techniques proved to be a breakthrough technology that allows conducting more accurate performance assessments of components of industrial equipment with increased efficiency. In this research paper, a numerical analysis of the newly developed inspection technique based on the unique properties of the ultrasonic phased array technique will be presented. It aims at combining the ability to steer and focus beams of a phased array transducer with the high surface sensitivity of Rayleigh waves to develop a multiple inspection technique. The developed method provides the possibility to detect surface defects and volumetric defects during a single inspection procedure. The results of simulations show that Rayleigh waves possess high stability of the amplitude with regard to the propagation distance and angle of steering; therefore, they are very suitable for surface defect detection. At the same time, the Time-of-Flight Diffraction (ToFD) technique used with a single probe configuration allows detecting embedded cracks with sufficient accuracy.      

Keywords:

Nondestructive testing, Ultrasonic phased array, Time-of-flight diffraction, Surface defect detection

References

  1. [1] Ernst, R., Weder, M., & Dual, J. (2012). Multiple defect detection by applying the time reversal principle on dispersive waves in beams. E-journal of nondestructive testing, 17(7), 1–9. http://www.ndt.net/?id=12790
  2. [2] Zhang, J., Drinkwater, B. W., Wilcox, P. D., & Hunter, A. J. (2010). Defect detection using ultrasonic arrays: The multi-mode total focusing method. NDT & e international, 43(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.10.001
  3. [3] Ludwig, R., & Lord, W. (1986). Developments in the finite element modeling of ultrasonic NDT phenomena. Conference proceedings and presentations, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7763-8_7
  4. [4] Baskaran, G., Rao, C. L., & Balasubramaniam, K. (2007). Simulation of the TOFD technique using the finite element method. Insight-non-destructive testing and condition monitoring, 49(11), 641–646. https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2007.49.11.641
  5. [5] Honarvar, F., & Khorasani, S. (2010). Simulation of time of flight diffraction (ToFD) technique by finite element method. E-journal of nondestructive testing (EJNDT), 15(5), 1–8. https://www.ndt.net/article/SimNDT2010/papers/16_Honarvar_Rev1.pdf
  6. [6] Hosseini, S. H., & Honarvar, F. (2023). A numerical model for ultrasonic time-of-flight diffraction (TOFD) testing of austenitic welds. Russian journal of nondestructive testing, 59(2), 182–203. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183092360003X
  7. [7] Dai, X., Lu, C., & Zheng, M. F. (2014). FEM analyses of the tofd technique in unequal thickness component. Recent research on mechanical engineering, mechatronics and automation (Vol. 574, pp. 427–431). Trans Tech Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.574.427
  8. [8] Silk, M. G. (1976). The determination of crack penetration using ultrasonic surface waves. NDT international, 9(6), 290–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-9126(76)90071-7
  9. [9] Date, K., Shimada, H., & Ikenaga, N. (1982). Crack height measurement — an evaluation of the accuracy of ultrasonic timing methods. NDT international, 15(6), 315–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-9126(82)90068-2
  10. [10] Hévin, G., Abraham, O., Pedersen, H. A., & Campillo, M. (1998). Characterization of surface cracks with Rayleigh waves: A numerical model. NDT & e international, 31(4), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8695(98)80013-3
  11. [11] Scala, C. M., & Bowles, S. J. (2000). Laser ultrasonics for surface-crack depth measurement using transmitted near-field Rayleigh waves. AIP conference proceedings, 509(1), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1306068
  12. [12] Verma, B., & Bélanger, P. (2024). Surface breaking crack sizing method using pulse-echo Rayleigh waves. Ultrasonics, 138, 107232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2023.107232
  13. [13] Liu, Z., Li, Z., Lyu, D., Zhang, Z., & Hu, H. (2025). Imaging method of surface defect using leaky Rayleigh wave with ultrasonic phased array. Nondestructive testing and evaluation, 40(6), 2311–2328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2024.2377726
  14. [14] Verma, B., & Bélanger, P. (2023). An alternative Rayleigh wave excitation method using an ultrasonic phased array. Ultrasonics, 135, 107121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2023.107121
  15. [15] Xiao, J., Hu, Y., Cao, S., & Cui, F. (2023). Characterization of surface-breaking cracks on tubular structures using ultrasonic phased array with rayleigh waves. International journal of computational methods, 20(06), 2143005. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219876221430052
  16. [16] Vu, A., Madhuranthakam, Y., Poudel, A., & Chakrapani, S. K. (2023). Numerical study of rayleigh wave interaction with rolling contact fatigue type of defects. Research in nondestructive evaluation, 34(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09349847.2023.2180560
  17. [17] Kolkoori, F. D. S., Koch, S. D. R., & Falter, T. D. S. (2024). 3D hybrid modeling for the ultrasonic phased array inspection of porosity in heavy plates: Application simulation and experimental validation. E-journal of nondestructive testing, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.58286/28218
  18. [18] Xu, Q., & Wang, H. (2022). Sound field modeling method and key imaging technology of an ultrasonic phased array: A review. Applied sciences, 12(16), 7962. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12167962
  19. [19] Torbali, M. E., Zolotas, A., Avdelidis, N. P., Alhammad, M., Ibarra-Castanedo, C., & Maldague, X. P. (2024). A complementary fusion-based multimodal non-destructive testing and evaluation using phased-array ultrasonic and pulsed thermography on a composite structure. Materials, 17(14), 3435. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17143435
  20. [20] Xiao, J., & Cui, F. (2023). Machine learning enhanced characterization of surface defects using ultrasonic Rayleigh waves. NDT & e international, 140, 102969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.102969
  21. [21] Sanchez Duo, I., Lanzagorta, J. L., Aizpurua Maestre, I., & Galdos, L. (2024). Enhancing time-of-flight diffraction (TOFD) inspection through an innovative curved-sole probe design. Sensors, 24(19), 6360. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24196360
  22. [22] Cheng, Q., He, J., Yang, S., Gu, X., Huang, H., & Luo, Y. (2023). Propagation characteristics of ultrasonic waves generated by phased array laser in coating/substrate structure. International journal of thermophysics, 44(8), 116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-023-03225-y
  23. [23] Bachhav, K. J., Gantala, T., & Balasubramaniam, K. (2024). guided wave phased array ultrasonic imaging for thin plate inspection. E-journal of nondestructive testing, 29(7), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.58286/29801
  24. [24] Connolly, G. D. (2009). Modelling of the propagation of ultrasound through austenitic steel welds [Thesis]. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/research-centres-and-groups/non-destructive-evaluation/GDConnolly-thesis.pdf

Downloads

Published

2026-03-22

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Mechanical Technology and Engineering Insights (MTEI)

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Cornelio, O. M. ., & Nikkhah Bahrami, M. . (2026). Concurrent Detection of Surface and Subsurface Defects via Phased Array Ultrasonic Multiple Inspection: A Finite Element Simulation Study. Mechanical Technology and Engineering Insights, 3(1), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.48313/mtei.v3i1.81

Similar Articles

1-10 of 20

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.